14th Congress of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation and the 5th Middle East Transplant Games
Liver transplantation
Comparison of Different Scoring Systems in Predicting Short-Term Mortality After Liver Transplantation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.11.067Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Liver transplantation is the only curative treatment for ESLD and selected primary hepatic malignancies.

  • SOFA score is superior for MELD, APACHE II, and CTP scores in predicting short-term outcomes.

  • Respiratory rate, serum bilirubin level, and duration of ICU stay may be risk factors related to early mortality after LDLT.

Abstract

Background

Many scoring systems have been used in predicting the outcomes of liver transplantations. The aim of this study was to compare between 4 scoring systems—Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and Child Turcotte-Pugh —among patients who underwent living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) seeking to evaluate the best system to correlate with post-operative outcomes.

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 53 patients who had received LDLT in a tertiary care hospital from January 2005 to December 2010. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were recorded. Each patient was assessed by use of 4 scoring systems before transplantation and on post-operative days 1 to 7 and at 3 months.

Results

The overall 3-month survival rate was 64%. The pre-transplant SOFA score had the best discriminatory power; moreover, the SOFA score on post-operative day 7 had the best Youden index (.875). The survival rate at 3-month follow-up after liver transplantation differed significantly (P = .00023, highest area under the receiver operator characteristic curve = .952) between patients who had SOFA scores <8 and those had SOFA score >8 on post–liver transplant day 7. This study also demonstrated that respiratory rate (P = .017) and serum bilirubin level (P = .048) and duration of intensive care unit stay (P = .04) are significant risk factors related to early mortality after LDLT.

Conclusions

The pre-transplant SOFA score was a statistically significant predictor of 3-month mortality; SOFA score on post–liver transplant day 7 had the best discriminative power for predicting 3-month mortality.

Section snippets

Methods

The protocol of this study was approved by the scientific board of faculty of medicine, Cairo University Egypt, which ceded obtaining informed consent. A review was conducted of retrospectively collected medical records of 53 patients who had received LDLT in a tertiary care hospital (Kasr Alainy Hospital) from January 2005 to December 2010. Data collected included demographic data, clinical and laboratory results, length of ICU stay, and outcome. Liver disease was largely attributed to

Results

The characteristics of 53 liver transplant recipients are listed in Table 1. The overall 3-month survival rate was 64% (34/53), based on 3-month mortality after liver transplantation patients were divided into 2 groups: survivors (group I) and non-survivors (group II).

We compared demographic, clinical, and laboratory data between the 2 groups as shown in Table 2. The mean values for respiratory rate, total bilirubin level, and duration of ICU stay after surgery were significantly higher in

Discussion

Many scoring systems had been applied for prediction of outcomes in patients admitted to ICUs; however, the application of scoring systems in allograft recipients has not been studied enough [17]. In liver allograft recipients, many factors may affect their outcomes during the period of ICU admission [18], [19]. In the present study, we compared 4 severity classification systems concerning mortality retrospectively after liver transplantation.

According to our results, the 3-month mortality rate

Conclusions

This study illustrates the excellent prognostic power of SOFA score and its superiority for other scoring systems in predicting short-term mortality after LDLT.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (16)

  • Impact of the Acute and Chronic Liver Failure–Sequential Evaluation of Organ Failure Scoring System on the Prognosis of Liver Transplant

    2022, Transplantation Proceedings
    Citation Excerpt :

    The results are presented in Table 2. In several recent studies, the CLIF-SOFA scoring system has been shown to be a statistically significant predictor of survival at 1 year after liver transplant [3,4]. In fact, in 1 study, the discriminative power of mortality at 1 year of the CLIF-SOFA was superior to the MELD [4].

  • Mapping nursing interventions using the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System in bloodless liver transplantations

    2020, Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
    Citation Excerpt :

    The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is a widely used organ dysfunction score to characterise patient severity and predictoutcome. The Child Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores are commonly used to assess the severity of liver dysfunction and to predict the outcome of cirrhotic patients (Elsayed, Sholkamy, Elshazli, Elshafie, & Naguib, 2015) (Piotrowski, Sączewska-Piotrowska, Jaroszewicz, & Boroń-Kaczmarska, 2018). These scoring systems stratify the severity of illness during critical care but do not perform well as measures or indicators of nursing workload (Greaves et al., 2018).

  • Mortality Predictors After Liver Transplant in the Intensive Care Unit

    2018, Transplantation Proceedings
    Citation Excerpt :

    The findings of this study suggest that APACHE II was a predictive mortality score after liver TX (P = .0046) in the multivariate analysis. Thus, Elsayed et al [12], in comparing 2 groups of survivors and nonsurvivors of liver TX, found that APACHE II presented a high level of significance on the first and seventh days of ICU admission to predict mortality after TX. Zhang et al [11] also observed that APACHE II was a predictor of patient mortality after liver TX.

  • Risk Factors for Mortality in 272 Patients With Lung Transplant: A Multicenter Analysis of 7 Intensive Care Units

    2017, Archivos de Bronconeumologia
    Citation Excerpt :

    The SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score is a composite score comprising 6 items: the respiratory, coagulation, hepatic, cardiovascular, renal and neurological systems. It is used to track patient status during ICU stay and to establish the extent of organ function or failure.3 Pulmonary graft dysfunction (PGD) severity was graded according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) consensus,4 using the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text