Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 41, Issue 3 , Pages 827-829, April 2009

Different Intervals of Ischemic Preconditioning on Small Bowel Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rats

  • D.T. Jácome

      Affiliations

    • Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
  • ,
  • M.S. Abrahão

      Affiliations

    • Surgery and Research Post-Graduating Program, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • R.J. Morello

      Affiliations

    • Surgery and Research Post-Graduating Program, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • J.L. Martins

      Affiliations

    • Pediatric Surgery Division, Surgery and Research Post-Graduating Program, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • A.C. Medeiros

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
  • ,
  • E.F.S. Montero

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Edna Frasson de Souza Montero, Al. Espada, 134 – Res. Onze – Alphaville, 06540-395 – Santana de Parnaíba – SP - Brazil

Abstract 

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to establish morphologically the best time of vascular occlusion to induce ischemic preconditioning (IPC) for rat small bowel undergoing ischemia and reperfusion injury.

Methods

After approval by the Ethics Committee, 36 EPM-1 young adult Wistar rats from 300–350 g were distributed into 6 groups: sham (S); ischemia and reperfusion (IR), with 50 minutes of cranial mesenteric artery occlusion and 30 minutes of reperfusion; IPC with 1 cycle of 2 minutes (IPC-2), 5 minutes (IPC-5), 10 minutes (IPC-10), or 15 minutes (IPC-15), followed by sustained IR. The animals anesthetized with ketamine (60 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) intramuscular (IM), were maintained on mattress heat, hydrated with saline (80 mL/kg), and injected with 100 IU heparin. Samples of jejunum were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and classified according to Park et al. Statistical analysis of results was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests (P < .05).

Results

The histological evaluation showed no difference between IR and IPC15 rats (5.2 and 5, respectively; P = .84). Greater jejunal injury was observed with IPC15 (5) compared with other groups (IPC2 = 3, P = .03; IPC5 = 3.2, P = .05; IPC10 = 2.8, P = .02, respectively). There was no difference between groups IPC2 × IPC5 × IPC10.

Conclusion

Morphologically, IPC with short times promoted greater intestinal protection against the IR lesion in rats.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) - Ministry of Science and Tecnologia (MCT), process number 310698/2006-5.

PII: S0041-1345(09)00131-6

doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.01.071

Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 41, Issue 3 , Pages 827-829, April 2009