Other aspect
Religious Aspects of Organ Transplantation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.049Get rights and content

Abstract

No religion formally forbids donation or receipt of organs or is against transplantation from living or deceased donors. Only some orthodox jews may have religious objections to “opting in.” However, transplantation from deceased donors may be discouraged by Native Americans, Roma Gypsies, Confucians, Shintoists, and some Orthodox rabbis. Some South Asia Muslim ulemas (scholars) and muftis (jurists) oppose donation from human living and deceased donors because the human body is an “amanat” (trusteeship) from God and must not be desecrated following death, but they encourage xenotransplantation research. No religion formally obliges one to donate or refuse organs. No religion formally obliges one to consider cadaveric organs “a societal resource” or considers organ donation “a religious duty” (except some rabbis and isolated Muslim and Christian scholars) No religion has a formal position on “bonus points,” which is priority on the waiting list. Living organ donation is strongly encouraged only between jesus christians (15 of 28 jesus christians worldwide have donated a kidney). No religion forbids this practice. Directed organ donation to people of the same religion has been proposed only by some Orthodox Jews and some Islamic Ulemas/Muftis. Only some Muslim Ulemas/Muftis and some Asian religions may prefer living donation over cadaveric donation. No religion prefers cadaveric over living donation. No religion formally forbids non–heart-beating donors (nhbd) cadaveric donation or cross-over donation. Due to the sacrad of human life, the Catholic Church is against donation from anencephalic donors or after active euthanasia.

No religion formally forbids xenotransplantation. Addressing the participants of the First International Congress of the Society for Organ Sharing in 1991, Pope John Paul II said “There are many questions of an ethical, legal and social nature which need to be more deeply investigated. There are even shameful abuses which call for determined action on the part of medical association and donor societies, and especially of competent legislative bodies” and later on “In effect, the human body is always a personal body, the body of a person. The body cannot be treated as a merely physical or biological entity, nor can its organs and tissues ever be used as item for sale or exchange”. Addressing the participants at the XVIII International Congress of the Transplantation Society in 2000, Pope John Paul II said “Accordingly, any procedure which tends to commercialize human organs or to consider them as items of exchange or trade must be considered morally unacceptable, because to use the body as an object is to violate the dignity of the human person” and later on added “The criteria for assigning donated organs should in no way be discriminatory (i.e. based on age, sex, race, religion, social standing, etc.) or utilitarian (i.e. based on work capacity, social usefulness, etc.).” To conclude, according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church Compendium signed by Pope Benedict XVI on june 28, 2005, 476. Are allowed transplantation and organ donation, before and after death? Organ transplantation is morally acceptable with the consent of the donor and without excessive risks for him/her. For the noble act of organ donation after death, the real death of the donor must be fully ascertained.

Section snippets

Discussion

David Steinberg from Lahey Clinic and Robert M. Veatch from the Kennedy Institute of Ethics of Georgetown University suggest an “opting in” paradigm for kidney transplantation with bonus allocation points for those willing to donate organs. David J. Undis from LifeSharers proposes a “club” approach. According to Elisa J. Gordon from Loyola University of Chicago, Steinberg's “proposal harkens back to the unethical practice's of Seattle's 'God Committee' of the 1960s.” She also says that some

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (99)

  • Medical Students’ Views on Cadaver and Organ Donation

    2022, Transplantation Proceedings
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, both male and female students answered “I would like to donate my organs” at a high rate on the subject of organ transplantation. Moral and religious reasons can make both male and female students highly hesitant to donate themselves as cadavers [24]. However, when asked in the current study if moral and religious reasons prevented them from donating themselves as cadavers, both male and female students had a high rate of “strongly disagree” or “disagree” answers.

  • Why are there so many liver transplants from living donors in Asia and so few in Europe and the US?

    2021, Journal of Hepatology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Various regional interpretations of Islam have also led to ambiguity with regards to donation of organs.6,7 Despite these established beliefs, most religious leaders across the continent have unequivocally supported the noble cause of saving a life by donating organs.1,4–6 The common cultural belief especially among South-East Asians on the need to preserve the intactness of the human body after death has led to a reluctance to accept deceased organ donation.2,8

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text