Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 39, Issue 10 , Pages 2975-2976, December 2007

Technical Complications in Organ Procurement

  • E. Domínguez Fernández

      Affiliations

    • Department of Visceral, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Dr. E. Dominguez, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
  • ,
  • M. Schmid

      Affiliations

    • German Foundation for Organ Transplantation (DSO), Mainz, Germany.
  • ,
  • K. Schlosser

      Affiliations

    • Department of Visceral, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
  • ,
  • D. Mauer

      Affiliations

    • German Foundation for Organ Transplantation (DSO), Mainz, Germany.
  • ,
  • Working Group of the Organ Procurement Central Region of the German Foundation for Organ Transplantation (DSO)

Abstract 

It is of crucial importance that harvested organs are not discarded because of lesions inflicted during the procurement operation. From January 2005 to January 2006, a total of 395 organs were procured: 266 kidneys, 102 livers, and 27 pancreate. Two kidneys were lost due to vascular lesions, and 1 liver could not be transplanted because of a severe parenchymal injury (0.75% total organ losses). In 33 of 198 cases (16.7%) despite lesions to renal vessels or to the ureter, the kidneys were transplanted after back-table repair procedures. Vascular lesions were observed in 10% of the evaluated livers (8 of 102) and in 3 of 18 pancreatic grafts. In the literature, a total organ loss of 0.75% because of technical problems demonstrates a high standard of visceral organ procurement in our region. Hence, reparable vascular and ureteral lesions in 10% to 16.4% indicated the need for better surgical training and standardization in procurement techniques. We believe that double-checking both the organ and quality reports and giving immediate feedback to the procurement surgeons in cases of technical problems are effective ways to perform quality control. It must be our goal to increase the response rate of the quality forms.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0041-1345(07)01154-2

doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.07.092

Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 39, Issue 10 , Pages 2975-2976, December 2007