Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 39, Issue 8 , Pages 2480-2482 , October 2007

Comparative Study Between Two Techniques of Ureteroneocystostomy: Taguchi and Lich-Gregoir

References 

  1. Taguchi H, Saito K, Yamada T. Ureteroneocystostomy by means of a modified triangular flap method. J Urol. 1975;114:705
  2. Kouwenhoven EA, de Bruin RWF, Heeman UW, et al. Ureteroneocystostomy contributes to late functional and morphological changes in rat kidney transplants. J Urol. 2001;165:1700
  3. Zargar MA, Shahkrokh H, Mohammadi Fallah MR, et al. Comparing Taguchi and anterior Lich-Gregoir ureterovesical reimplantation techniques for kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2005;37:3077
  4. Secin FP, Rovegno AR, Marrugat RE, et al. Comparing Taguchi and Lich-Gregoir ureterovesical reimplantation techniques for kidney transplants. J Urol. 2002;168:926
  5. Tzimas GN, Hayati H, Tchervenkov JI, et al. Ureteral implantation technique and urologic complications in adult kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2003;35:2420
  6. Figueiredo A, Parada B, Cunha MF, et al. Ureteral complications: analysis of risk factors in 1000 renal transplants. Transplant Proc. 2003;35:1087
  7. Figueiredo A. Estudo dos factores de risco e do valor prognóstico da ocorrência de complicações uretéricas e avaliação dos fenómenos de rejeição (In Contributo experimental para o estudo da transplantação da bexiga, Coimbra). 2003;
  8. van Roijen JH, Kirkels WJ, Zietse R, et al. Long-term graft survival after urological complications of 695 kidney transplantations. J Urol. 2001;165:1884
  9. El-Mekresh M, Osman Y, Ali-El-Dein B, et al. Urological complications after living-donor renal transplantation. BJU Int. 2001;87:295
  10. Kashi SH, Lodge JPA, Giles GR, et al. Ureteric complications in renal transplantation. Br J Urol. 1992;70:139

PII: S0041-1345(07)00860-3

doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.07.041

Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 39, Issue 8 , Pages 2480-2482 , October 2007

Article Tools