Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 39, Issue 3 , Pages 596-599, April 2007

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Mycophenolic Acid in Kidney Transplant Patients: A Abbreviated Sampling Strategy

  • H. Muller

      Affiliations

    • Transplant Unit, Higueras Hospital, Talcahuano, Chile
    • Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Catolica Santisima Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Hans Muller, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Catolica Santisima Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile.
  • ,
  • S. Solari

      Affiliations

    • Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • ,
  • C. Zuniga

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Catolica Santisima Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile
  • ,
  • I. Guerra

      Affiliations

    • Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • ,
  • J. Troncoso

      Affiliations

    • Transplant Unit, Higueras Hospital, Talcahuano, Chile
  • ,
  • R. Ovalle

      Affiliations

    • Transplant Unit, Higueras Hospital, Talcahuano, Chile
  • ,
  • J. Morente

      Affiliations

    • Transplant Unit, Higueras Hospital, Talcahuano, Chile
  • ,
  • C. Pedreros

      Affiliations

    • Transplant Unit, Higueras Hospital, Talcahuano, Chile

Abstract 

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) levels have demonstrated a good correlation with clinical outcomes, but with great pharmacokinetic variability between patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended to include a 12-hour area under the concentration–time curve (AUC). Since full AUC estimates are not practical for routine monitoring, limited sampling strategies have been suggested. We evaluated MPA pharmacokinetics in 18 stable renal transplant patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as part of their immunosuppressive therapy. The correlation between measured and estimated AUC was assessed using 4 different sparse sampling algorithms. The mean values for C0 and AUC0–6h were 1.8 ± 1.2 mg/L and 31.1 ± 14.8 mg*h/L, respectively. The dose-corrected AUC0–6h was 35.4 ± 17.9 mg*h/L. Regarding the single time points, C0 showed a low correlation with AUC0–6h (r2 = .34); C1.5, the best correlation (r2 = .72); and C3, the worst (r2 = .07). Sparse sample algorithms used to estimate 12-hour AUC including C0, C1, C2, C3, C4, and/or C6 showed a good correlation with the calculated AUC0–6 (r2 = .81–.96). The algorithm that used C0, C1, C2, and C4 showed the best correlation, but we also found a good correlation (r2 = .91) with C0, C1, and C2. Based on these results, we have suggested using the 3-point algorithm (C0, C1, and C2) for MPA TDM in stable renal transplant patients due to the good correlation with drug exposure and better functionality than an algorithm using a 4-hour postdose measurement.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0041-1345(06)01574-0

doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.12.027

Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 39, Issue 3 , Pages 596-599, April 2007