Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 38, Issue 7 , Pages 1980-1981, September 2006

Preoperative Evaluation of Living Related Kidney Donor: Which Kidney to Donate?

  • C.-T. Wu
  • ,
  • K.-L. Liu
  • ,
  • S.-H. Chu
  • ,
  • Y.-J. Chiang

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Yang-Jen Chiang, MD, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 5, Fushing Street, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.

Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Abstract 

Objectives

As the number of cadaveric donor is far beyond the demand of the waiting list, living related kidney transplantation is important for the worldwide organ shortage. Besides, living related transplantation has advantages compared with cadaveric transplantation in terms of graft function and survival. However, the remaining kidney function of the living donor needs to be evaluated.

Methods

We collected 28 paired living kidney donations from March 2003 to March 2005. All patients underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. The preoperative kidney evaluation included renal echography, renal nuclear scan, computed tomography angiography (CTA), and creatinine clearance (CCr). The renal function of the donor kidney was expressed as (donor kidney/both kidneys)%. The percentage renal function from renal echography, renal nuclear scan, and CTA were correlated with CCr.

Results

The mean percentage of donor kidney function according to renal echo, nuclear scan, and CTA were 49.77%, 51.83%, and 50.70%, respectively. The correlation coefficients for renal echography, nuclear scan, and CTA to CCr were −0.316, −0.201, and 0.123, respectively. The correlation coefficients for renal echography, nuclear scan, and CTA to postoperative serum creatinine of donor were 0.426, 0.036, and −0.119, respectively.

Conclusion

From the viewpoint of donor postoperative residual renal function, preoperative renal sonography offered a better predictive value than nuclear scan or CTA.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0041-1345(06)00756-1

doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.06.110

Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 38, Issue 7 , Pages 1980-1981, September 2006