Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 38, Issue 5 , Pages 1213-1217, June 2006

Comparison Between Transcranial Color Doppler Ultrasonography and Angiography in the Confirmation of Brain Death

  • J. Poularas

      Affiliations

    • Intensive Care Unit, Genimatas General State Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • D. Karakitsos

      Affiliations

    • Intensive Care Unit, Genimatas General State Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • G. Kouraklis

      Affiliations

    • Second Department of Propedeutic Surgery, University of Athens, School of Medicine, Transplantation Center
  • ,
  • A. Kostakis

      Affiliations

    • Second Department of Propedeutic Surgery, University of Athens, School of Medicine, Transplantation Center
  • ,
  • E. De Groot

      Affiliations

    • Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • A. Kalogeromitros

      Affiliations

    • Intensive Care Unit, Genimatas General State Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • D. Bilalis

      Affiliations

    • Intensive Care Unit, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • J. Boletis

      Affiliations

    • Transplantation Center, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • ,
  • A. Karabinis

      Affiliations

    • Intensive Care Unit, Genimatas General State Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Andreas Karabinis, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor in Intensive Care Medicine, Athens University, School of Medicine, Director of ICU Department, Genimatas General State Hospital, Mesogeion Ave 154, Athens, Greece.

Abstract 

Objective

Cerebral blood flow tests have increasingly been advocated for the confirmation of brain death (BD). Angiography has been considered the gold standard in the diagnosis of BD but is invasive. We validated transcranial color Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) to confirm BD by comparing it to angiography.

Patients and methods

Forty patients experienced the clinical diagnosis of brain death due to head injury in 19 cases (47.5%), cerebral hemorrhage in 11 (27.5%), subarachnoid hemorrhage in 7 (17.5%), and cerebral infarction in 3 (7.5%). Blood pressure, heart rate, SPO2, and PCO2 were monitored throughout the study. Patients were excluded if episodes of hypoxia, arrhythmia, and hypotension occurred during examinations, or if the TCD was not technically feasible.

Results

Both angiography and TCD confirmed BD in all patients. The agreement between the above methods to confirm BD was 100%. Angiography showed the absence of filling of intracranial arteries, while TCD revealed: (1) brief systolic forward flow or systolic spikes and diastolic reversed flow (50%); (2) brief systolic forward flow or systolic spikes and no diastolic flow (25%); (3) no demonstrable flow in a patient in whom flow had been clearly documented on a previous TCD examination (12.5%). Five patients required repeated TCD examinations, because of initial detection of a diastolic to-and-fro flow pattern. BD was confirmed by TCD in the above patients after 30 hours of clinical BD.

Conclusion

TCD was a sensitive tool to diagnose BD, affording a reliable alternative examination to standard angiography.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0041-1345(06)00217-X

doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.02.127

Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 38, Issue 5 , Pages 1213-1217, June 2006