Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 38, Issue 5 , Pages 1238-1242, June 2006

Machine Perfusion Preservation of the Pig Liver Using a New Preservation Solution, Polysol

Surgical Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract 

Introduction

The current gold standard for donor liver preservation is cold storage in a preservation solution (4°C), such as Celsior or the University of Wisconsin solution (UW). Recent studies have suggested the benefits of machine perfusion (MP) over cold storage. To improve the results of MP, an enriched preservation solution (named Polysol) was developed, which in a rat liver preservation model proved to be superior to the UW-gluconate solution. The aim of this study was to assess Polysol in a pig liver preservation model.

Materials and methods

Female pigs (35 to 40 kg) were used as liver donors. After heparinization, the liver was washed out using Ringer’s lactate, followed by the preservation solution (4°C). The liver was preserved for 24 hours by either cold storage using Celsior (n = 5) or MP using Polysol (n = 5). For analysis of liver damage and function, livers were reperfused for 60 minutes using oxygenated Krebs-Henseleit buffer.

Results

CS-Celsior caused significantly more damage compared with MP-Polysol (t = 60, AST: 622 ± 215 versus 222 ± 55; ALT: 17 ± 6 versus 5 ± 1). Intravascular resistance during reperfusion was significantly higher after CS-Celsior compared with MP-Polysol (t = 0, 0.20 ± 0.01 and 0.11 ± 0.02 mm Hg/mL/min, respectively). No differences were seen regarding ammonia clearance and urea production. In both groups, no bile was produced during reperfusion.

Conclusions

In an ex vivo pig liver preservation model significantly less damage was observed after machine perfusion preservation using Polysol, in comparison to cold storage using Celsior.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0041-1345(06)00153-9

doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.02.063

Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 38, Issue 5 , Pages 1238-1242, June 2006