Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 617-619, April 2004

Donor organ preservation in high-risk cardiac transplantation

  • G Faggian

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiac Surgery, Piazzale Stefani 1, Verona, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint request to Prof Giuseppe Faggian, Division of Cardiac Surgery; Piazzale Stefani 12, 37126 Verona, Italy
  • ,
  • A Forni

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiac Surgery, Piazzale Stefani 1, Verona, Italy
  • ,
  • A Mazzucco

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiac Surgery, Piazzale Stefani 1, Verona, Italy

Abstract 

Aim

To evaluate safety and efficacy of blood cardioplegia in a retrospective selected (but not randomized) donor/recipient population as standard organ preservation technique in high-risk heart transplants (HTX).

Materials and methods

The rationale of different strategies was based on both donor and recipient evaluations. Unstable donors with a long history of well-known risk factors and/or long-distance retrieval were given blood cardioplegia, particularly for HTX candidates in poor preoperative clinical condition. Organ protection was performed by administration of St Thomas II crystalloid cardioplegia in 74 patients (group 1) while 58 others (group 2) received blood cardioplegia.

Results

Groups I versus II shows comparable results for immediate postoperative mortality rates (4% vs 7%, P = .4), high doses of inotropic drug support (48% vs 20%, P = .08), and the need for postoperative mechanical assistance devices (9% vs 4.5%, P = .4). In contrast statistically significant differences were observed for occurrence of acute right ventricular failure (50% vs 5%; P = .004), atrioventricular conduction disturbances (63% vs 10%, P = .003), spontaneous sinus rhythm recovery (18% vs 64% P = .0038) and reperfusion interval (RI) (time between removal of aortic cross-clamp and discontinuation of extracorporeal circulation (ECC)) exceeding 30 minutes (70% vs 21%, P = .0004). Higher peak creatine kinase MB mean value (176 ± 23 vs 90 ± 19, P = .06) indicated more severe ischemic damage among G1 patients.

Conclusion

This study suggests that high-risk heart transplant candidates benefit from blood cardioplegia, due to the reduced incidence of both right ventricular failure and severe cardiac arrhythmia. Potential limitations to this novel technique may be linked to the higher expenses due to the need for a perfusion technician. Improved myocardial protection can be seen even in a longitudinal study on chronic rejection: this form of allograft protection may preserve the matrix and the endothelium.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0041-1345(04)00193-9

doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.02.049

Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 617-619, April 2004