Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 36, Issue 2, Supplement , Pages S261-S266, March 2004

Learning and new discovery with cyclosporine in the cambridge-king's programme: a personal view

  • R. Williams

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Hepatology, University College of London, London, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Professor Roger Williams, Director, Institute of Hepatology, University College London, 69-75 Chenies Mews, London, WC1E 6HX, UK.

Abstract 

Immunosuppressive regimens in the early precyclosporine days of liver transplantation for the Cambridge-King's Programme from 1968 until the early 1980s were inadequate in the control of rejection. The consequent use of high-dose steroids led to many infections, which seriously affected outcome. Nevertheless, occasional patients did well but a consistent increase in survival was not seen until after the introduction of cyclosporine and experience was gained with its proper usage in terms of toxicity. The development of Neoral with its greater oral bioavailability marked a major step forward in the development of the drug. Whether 2-hour postdose monitoring with reduction in rejection frequency and toxicity as described recently better match results with tacrolimus in comparison-controlled trials remains to be determined.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0041-1345(04)00008-9

doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.01.007

Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 36, Issue 2, Supplement , Pages S261-S266, March 2004