Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 35, Issue 8 , Pages 2873-2877, December 2003

Beneficial pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporine and itraconazole in renal transplant recipients

  • N.R Florea

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacy Practice, Loma Linda University School of Pharmacy (N.R.F.), Loma Linda, California, USA
  • ,
  • B Capitano

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh (B.C.), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  • ,
  • C.H Nightingale

      Affiliations

    • Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development (C.H.N., D.P.N.), Hartford, Connecticut, USA
    • Division of Research Administration (C.H.N.), Hartford, Connecticut, USA
  • ,
  • D Hull

      Affiliations

    • Department of Transplantation (D.H.), Hartford, Connecticut, USA
  • ,
  • G.J Leitz

      Affiliations

    • Ortho-Biotech (G.J.L.), Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA
  • ,
  • D.P Nicolau

      Affiliations

    • Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development (C.H.N., D.P.N.), Hartford, Connecticut, USA
    • Division of Infectious Diseases (D.P.N.), Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to David P. Nicolau, Pharm. D. FCCP, Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06102D, USA

Abstract 

Background

Itraconazole is often given for fungal prophylaxis to renal transplant recipients, who require concomitant cyclosporine in the immediate posttransplant period. We determined the extent of the pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporine and itraconazole oral solution in renal transplant recipients and the effect on daily drug costs.

Method

This was a single-center, open-label, nonrandomized study. Posttransplantation, renal transplant recipients received itraconazole solution 200 mg twice daily and cyclosporine, dosed to achieve target concentrations. Once at steady state, blood samples were collected over 12 hours for pharmacokinetic evaluation of cyclosporine, itraconazole, and hydroxy-itraconazole. Itraconazole was discontinued after approximately a 3-month prophylaxis regimen. Cyclosporine doses were titrated to achieve target concentrations and cyclosporine concentrations were once again determined when steady state was achieved. A noncompartmental analysis was used to analyze cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters. The pharmacoeconomic impact was measured based on the percent change in dose of cyclosporine when administered with and without itraconazole. Drug costs were calculated using the average wholesale price. The cost per patient, as well as the average cost, was calculated for the cyclosporine/itraconazole combination, as well as the cyclosporine regimen alone.

Results

Eight renal transplant recipients completed the study. All were included for itraconazole analyses and seven for cyclosporine analyses. Mean peak and trough itraconazole levels were 1.64 ± 0.82 and 1.23 ± 0.90 μg/mL respectively. Mean peak and trough hydroxy-itraconazole levels were 2.37 ± 1.55 and 2.20 ± 1.48 μg/mL, respectively. While on itraconazole, a 48% reduction in the mean total daily dose of cyclosporine was necessary to maintain target concentrations (171 ± 63.6 versus 329 ± 103.5 mg, P = .003). This reduction in cyclosporine dose resulted in a discounted itraconazole daily drug cost of approximately 29.5%.

Conclusion

Administering itraconazole with cyclosporine allows for a decrease in the cyclosporine dose, thus lowering daily drug costs and providing adequate antifungal coverage with itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole trough concentrations above the MIC90 of Candida and Aspergillus spp.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by a grant from Ortho Biotech, Raritan, New Jersey.

PII: S0041-1345(03)01204-1

doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2003.10.058

Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 35, Issue 8 , Pages 2873-2877, December 2003