Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 35, Issue 7 , Pages 2409-2411, November 2003

Basiliximab widens the therapeutic window for AUC-monitored neoral therapy early after kidney transplantation

  • F Balbontin

      Affiliations

    • Kidney Transplant program, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Dr Felipe Balbontin, Transplant Clinic, 4th FI Dickson, 1278 Tower Road, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H2Y9, Canada.
  • ,
  • B Kiberd

      Affiliations

    • Kidney Transplant program, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • ,
  • D Singh

      Affiliations

    • Kidney Transplant program, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • ,
  • J Squires

      Affiliations

    • Kidney Transplant program, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • ,
  • A Fraser

      Affiliations

    • Kidney Transplant program, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • ,
  • P Belitsky

      Affiliations

    • Kidney Transplant program, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • ,
  • J Lawen

      Affiliations

    • Kidney Transplant program, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Abstract 

Early adequate cyclosporine exposure has been shown to predict low acute rejection. Recently basiliximab induction has been added to immunosuppressive regimens to further reduce rejection. The aim of this study was to determine the importance of achieving the early cyclosporine therapeutic threshold with basiliximab induction. A retrospective analysis of first cadaver and nonidentical living donor transplant recipients treated with or without basiliximab induction was performed. All patients (n = 170) received neoral, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. The cyclosporine absorption profile was measured on day 3. Adequate cyclosporine exposure was defined as area under the curve (AUC) 0–4: >4400 μg · h/L at day 3. The primary outcome was acute rejection (AR) within the first 6 month. In the no basiliximab (control) group, AR occurred in 22% (17/78) of recipients and was strongly associated with low cyclosporine exposure on day 3. AR occurred in 39% (9/23) with cyclosporine AUC0–4 < 4400 μg · h/L compared with 15% (8/55) with AUC0–4 > 4400 μg · h/L (P = .016). In the basiliximab group, AR occurred in only 9% (8/92) of recipients and did not correlate with cyclosporine exposure. AR occurred in 8% (2/24) with cyclosporine AUC0–4 < 4400 μg · h/L compared with 9% (6/68) with AUC0–4 > 4400 μg · h/L (P = .94). Achieving cyclosporine therapeutic targets by day 3 may not be required when anti-IL2 induction is used.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0041-1345(03)00868-6

doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2003.08.005

Transplantation Proceedings
Volume 35, Issue 7 , Pages 2409-2411, November 2003